Tuesday, September 23, 2008

What're you rebelling against, Johnny?


















I like to think of myself as an artist, a musician, even though most of the time I don't act like it. Looking back at other periods in my life that have been more productive artistically, I find that there's a common emotional engine driving much of the production. This engine can be described loosely as angst of some sort or another, heartache, longing, sadness, regret; I think you could safely categorize it in the negative energy category. This is not uncommon in art, particularly in pop music: everything from boy loses girl to fuck da police. My wellspring seems to be an emotional void into which memories of loss and a bitter aching for erstwhile sweetness flow.

More recently my engine has been running not on heartache but on rage, a tightly-chained, off-balance oscillating weight of pure hostile desire which wants to break free and destroy the world. Instead of drawing from a well, internally I am poisoning the water supply. I am smashing at the bricks with a hammer. I am strapping on a dynamite belt. And I am noticing that my artistic production has almost totally ground to a halt. Is there something about rage that clogs the pistons of creativity, or do I just not know how to transform rage into art? Or do I not want to see the art my rage inspires?

What do you do with your rage?

2 Comments:

Blogger lou jones said...

in my experience expressing the rage is good, better for you than not...but that it will create art you do not want to look at. this is why i have a garage full of paintings and only a couple in the house.

they hurt to look at. no one wants to...and i finally figured out that i don't either.

but i'll keep them forever.

September 24, 2008 10:16 PM  
Blogger lou jones said...

ps. because i like disaster too.

September 24, 2008 10:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home